Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- programming:oop_object_oriented_programming [2023-12-08 11:24] – created admin
+++ programming:oop_object_oriented_programming [2024-06-25 15:54] (current) – admin
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== OOP - some negative notes ======
+====== Problems with OOP ======
+> “Object-oriented design is the Roman numerals of computing.” //– [[wp>Rob_Pike|Rob Pike]]//
+> “Sometimes, the elegant implementation is just a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function.” //– [[wp>John_Carmack|John Carmack]]//
+> “The problem with object-oriented languages is they've got all this implicit environment that they carry around with them. You wanted a banana but what you got was a gorilla holding the banana and the entire jungle.” //– [[wp>Joe_Armstrong_(programmer)|Joe Armstrong]]//
+> “The object-oriented model makes it easy to build up programs by accretion. What this often means, in practice, is that it provides a structured way to write spaghetti code.” //– [[wp>Paul_Graham_(programmer)|Paul Graham]]//
+> “I used to be enamored of object-oriented programming. I'm now finding myself leaning toward believing that it is a plot designed to destroy joy.” //– [[wp>Eric_Allman|Eric Allman]]//
-“object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing.” – Rob Pike
-“Sometimes, the elegant implementation is just a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function.” – John Carmack
-“The problem with object-oriented languages is they’ve got all this implicit environment that they carry around with them. You wanted a banana but what you got was a gorilla holding the banana and the entire jungle.” – Joe Armstrong
-“I used to be enamored of object-oriented programming. I’m now finding myself leaning toward believing that it is a plot designed to destroy joy.” – Eric Allman